UberizationUber, one of the leading urban mobility companies in Brazil, is facing a legal battle in the Supreme Federal Court (STF).
Tudo isso tem relação com o vínculo de emprego entre seus motoristas e entregadores e as plataformas de aplicativo.
The company requested a suspension of proceedings nas lower instances of Justice that address this issue, arguing the need to ensure the legal security the parties involved.
This measure from Uber comes after the STF decided to apply the general repercussion in the subject, which means that the court's understanding will be valid for similar cases in lower instances of Justice.
The numbers are striking: until May of last year, the Attorney General's Office (PGR) registered more than 17 thousand cases on the subject, while the Brazilian Association of Mobility and Technology (Amobitec) mentions 12,192 actions.
With this request, the Uber busca aguardar a definição do STF sobre o vínculo de emprego na “uberização”, termo que se refere à prestação de serviços por meio de plataformas digitais, como a própria Uber.
This suspension of labor lawsuits is a measure provided for by law and aims to ensure the legal security the parties involved until the issue is clarified by the STF.
STF's decision broadens the discussion on employment relationships.
O Supreme Federal Court (STF) unanimously decided to apply the general repercussion to the debate about the existence of an employment relationship between app drivers and transportation platforms.
This means that the STF decision will have reach in similar cases in lower instances of Justice. There is still no set date for the judgment of the matter in the STF.
Essa medida tem como objetivo pacificar a questão da “uberização” no Poder Judiciário e fornecer um entendimento universal sobre esse tipo de emprego.
The application of the general repercussion the STF is an important action aimed at bringing uniformity to the country's jurisprudence regarding the employment relationship between app drivers and the platforms they use. With this decision, many similar cases that may be pending in lower instances of Justice will be influenced by understanding of the STF, which could represent a significant change in how this type of work relationship is interpreted and regulated in Brazil.
- Warranty of legal security for the parties involved;
- Creation of a common understanding at the national level;
- Possibilidade de uma resposta jurídica mais clara para a questão da “uberização” no país.
This STF decision broaden the discussion about the employment relationship in the era of the app economy, raising several questions about the labor rights and guarantees of drivers.
A general repercussion applied by the court generates an expectation that a uniform understanding will be established regarding the topic, bringing greater legal certainty for the parties involved and helping to resolve the current controversy.
Now, it remains to follow the developments of this decision and wait for the date of the trial at the STF.
| Benefits | Implications |
|---|---|
| Greater legal security for the parties involved | It can impact the relationship between drivers and app platforms. |
| Possibility of a national understanding on the subject | It can generate changes in the regulation of the activity. |
| Resposta jurídica mais clara para a “uberização” | It can affect the business model of the platforms. |
Uberization: Creation of legal certainty
Uber, in the face of the STF decision to establish an understanding of the employment relationship between app drivers and transportation platforms, requested the suspension of the processes related to this issue.
This measure aims to ensure the legal security of the parties involved, allowing the decision made by the STF to be applied consistently in similar cases in lower instances of Justice.
The suspension of proceedings is a legal action aimed at awaiting clarification from the Supreme Federal Court (STF) on the issue before continuing with the judgments.
Dessa forma, busca-se evitar decisões divergentes que possam gerar ainda mais incertezas jurídicas no contexto da “uberização”.
“O pedido de suspensão dos processos é uma medida importante para garantir a segurança jurídica, que é fundamental tanto para as empresas quanto para os trabalhadores. Aguardar a decisão do STF nessa matéria é o caminho mais adequado para evitar conflitos e estabelecer um entendimento claro sobre o vínculo de emprego na modalidade de trabalho por aplicativo.” – Advogado especialista no tema.
Table: Number of cases related to employment relationship*
| Year | Number of Processes |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 8.756 |
| 2019 | 9.823 |
| 2020 | 12.192 |
*Data provided by the Brazilian Association of Mobility and Technology (Amobitec).
A bill proposes regulation of app driver activities.
While awaiting the decision of the Federal Supreme Court (STF) regarding the employment relationship between app drivers and the platforms, the federal government sent a draft law to the National Congress with the aim of regulating the activity of app drivers.
Esse projeto propõe a criação da categoria “trabalhador autônomo por plataforma” e estabelece direitos mínimos para esses profissionais, como uma jornada de trabalho de até 12 horas diárias, remuneração mínima mais o ganho variável com as corridas e contribuição para o INSS.
The proposal aims to guarantee labor rights for app drivers and to regulate this activity that is based on digital platforms.
The creation of this regulation is an important step to ensure that ride-hailing drivers have their rights respected, including the definition of a maximum working hours limit and minimum compensation.
In addition, contributions to the INSS ensure social protection for these professionals, guaranteeing access to benefits such as retirement, sick leave, and maternity leave.
It is essential that the National Congress analyzes and discusses this bill in a way that ensures fair and balanced regulation, protecting both the rights of app drivers and free competition in the market.
UberizationMain points of the bill:
- Criação da categoria “trabalhador autônomo por plataforma” para os motoristas de aplicativo.
- Work shift of up to 12 hours daily.
- Guaranteed minimum remuneration, in addition to variable earnings from races.
- Contribution to the INSS.
- Regulation of activities performed by digital platforms.
| Benefits of regulation | Impact |
|---|---|
| Warranty of labor rights for app drivers | Social protection and better working conditions |
| Balance between the interests of drivers and platforms | Improvement in labor relations |
| Legal security for all parties involved | Reduction of conflicts and legal proceedings |
Read More:
Best Car for Uber: Cost-Effective Options
How to Buy a PCD Car Step by Step
10 Safest Luxury Armored SUVs in the World
Safest Car in Brazil for Families
Conclusion Uberization
A batalha jurídica da Uber no STF em relação à “uberização” e ao vínculo de emprego de motoristas tem gerado discussões intensas sobre a regulamentação da atividade dos motoristas de aplicativo e a garantia de labor rights in this sector.
The decision of the STF to apply the general repercussion to the theme signals the search for a clear guideline in the legal field that can influence future decisions in lower instances of Justice.
While the STF promotes this important discussion, the federal government has been proposing a bill aimed at regulating the activity of app drivers.
O objetivo dessa proposta é garantir direitos mínimos para esses profissionais e estabelecer um marco legal para a “uberização”.
If approved, this measure will have a significant impact on how the activity of app drivers is treated in the country, providing greater legal security for all parties involved.
Both the final decision of the STF and the eventual approval of the bill will have a decisive impact on the relationship between app platforms and their drivers.
The search for a balance between technological innovation and labor protection is essential to ensure a fair and sustainable environment for all those involved in this constantly evolving landscape.
FAQ – Uberization
What did Uber request from the STF?
Uber requested the STF to suspension of proceedings related to the employment relationship between drivers and delivery workers and the app platforms.
What does the application of general repercussion by the STF mean?
The application of general repercussion by the STF means that the court's decision will be valid for similar cases in lower instances of the Justice system.
Why did Uber request the suspension of the proceedings?
Uber requested the suspension of the proceedings to ensure the legal security of the parties involved.
What does the bill proposed by the federal government suggest?
O projeto de lei propõe a regulamentação da atividade dos motoristas de aplicativo, criando a categoria “trabalhador autônomo por plataforma” e estabelecendo direitos mínimos para esses profissionais.
What will the final decision of the STF and the eventual approval of the bill impact?
The final decision of the STF and the eventual approval of the bill will have a significant impact on how the uberization is addressed in Brazil and in the labor rights of app drivers.
